Why Markets Need a Finance-Specific Knowledge Graph

29 January 2026

Without explicit domain structure, even strong LLMs can miss nuance or retrieve results that look relevant but arenโ€™t. Thatโ€™s especially true in financial markets, where language is dense, overlapping, and constantly evolving.

A finance-specific Knowledge Graph helps by:

โ€ข ๐—œ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜† through domain specific themes and well defined relationships between concepts
โ€ข ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜ when the same term carries different meanings across markets
โ€ข ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€, supported by paragraph level atomisation and precise disambiguation
โ€ข ๐—”๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป, enabling transparent tracing of how concepts link, evolve, and inform outputs
โ€ข ๐—˜๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ฅ๐—”๐—š, providing the structured domain backbone that makes RAG reliable, itโ€™s how you win with RAG

Our knowledge graph of more than ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ,๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐˜๐˜€ is ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—น๐˜† ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ, ensuring human oversight where it matters. This creates a clear, evolving map for models to navigate, one that reduces ambiguity, keeps pace with new themes, and provides a stable foundation for interpreting complex topics.

The takeaway is simple:

๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ธ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ, ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ต๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜, ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—”๐—œ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ.